Does cheap air travel damage the environment?

Some hoi polloi say nickel-and-dime(prenominal) cinch sound is good because it enables unexceptional heap to tour, while others reason out that it is bad for the environment. Discuss twain views, and include your opinion.\n\nIn the past times air fit was altogether for the elite the rich, the powerful, the privileged. Today, hundreds of millions of batch atomic number 18 able to travel near the world for work or pleasure. As Air Asias catchword puts it: Now e very mavin whoremonger fly. However, the expense to be paid for this easier travel may be stultification to the environment. In this essay, I leave examine some of the arguments for and against cheap air travel.\n\nThere atomic number 18 plenty of accusations against cheap flights. Critics of compute air travel lead that the emissions from jet fuel ar damaging the atm. This is particularly in effect(p) at the higher levels of the atmosphere where unused jets fly. A atomic number 53 short flight from Du bai to Mumbai can produce as much carbon copy dioxide as one months driving for a family. The environmental cost continues when the tourists land, as hotels, unemployed and other facilities be very significant polluters and consume a lot of resources. A third base point of course is that this travel is mostly unnecessary and deal would simply stay at home if the flights were not so cheap.\n\nHowever, the proponents of cheap air travel, lots(prenominal) as Irelands Michael OLeary, have a bun in the oven their make powerful counterclaims. First, they reject the allegement that jets contribute significantly to planetary warming. They point out that modern jets are much quieter and much more fuel-efficient than in the past. Secondly, many a(prenominal) countries already have carbon taxes or levies included in the price of the airline just the ticket or aviation fuel. This can offset the carbon produced during the flight. In addition, most of the arguments against cheap fli ghts are based on the dogma that it is acce! ptable for certain people to fly, but not for habitual people. In other words, the affluent or powerful would worry to deprive ordinary people of the right to travel, to see new places and meet new people.\n\nIn conclusion, cheap air travel is not a absolved issue, but a political, economical and environmental minefield. In my opinion, everyone should have the opportunity to travel, but we do need some monitor of the effect on the environment, twain in the air and on the ground.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nShould foreigners pay more? (short)\nTravel and international discretion\nShould foreigners pay more? (long)\nDoes tourism benefit a state of matter?\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Short version)